I don't like to write. I like having written.
When I'm writing, I usually don't like what shows up on the screen. I'm too close to it. There's the idea of what I want to say, then there's the inner critic that wants to jump in and fix things like grammar, style, and structure. To write well, I have to stifle the critic and be willing to write lots and write badly. The name I have for it is spilling my thoughts onto paper. Editing is for later.
Content is hard to come by. For me, it has to be stream of consciousness, or free writing. I have to be willing to write a lot, a lot of which may get deleted, to see where the writing is going and to see if there is any substance or value in it. I don't like that it works that way, but I've come to terms with it and I still get enough out of it to continue writing. And that surprises me.
Writing is very hard work. But I like reading what I've written. Before I can enjoy reading my own writing, I need to have some distance from it, and that means time. I need to let it go for at least a week. Then I can enjoy it as a reader and not read it form the perspective of an author or editor. I'll still edit it. I need to do that from a reader's perspective. When I'm writing, I know what I want to say and I usually think I've said it well. But I'm too close to it then. I need to lose my familiarity with it so I can see if readers will understand what I was trying to communicate. I know what I meant, but do they?
Once I get it right, I'll read it four or five more times just for the pure enjoyment of reading it. I'll still tinker with words and structure. But I'll know it's finished when I start rewriting things, then rewriting them back the way they were.
When I haven't written for a while, I long for that joy and I write again.
Friday, December 14, 2007
Writing
Posted by
Mike M.
at
10:04 PM
0
comments
Labels: Writing
Monday, December 10, 2007
Getting Some Zen
I got an 8GB Creative Zen when it went on sale at Future Shop for $180 from $220.
My wife has a 4GB second gen iPod Nano. She got it for $220 a couple weeks before the third gen was announced with the 4GB model priced at $149. Figures.
I like the Nano. It does everything well. My only complaints are that the screens on the second gen models are too small, iPods are priced at a premium, and Apple seems insistent on deliberately leaving out features. So I tested the Creative waters.
So far, I'm happy with my Zen.
Likes:
- Price.
- Small size.
- Big, crisp 2.5" screen.
- Looks cool.
- Nice interface.
- 25 hr. battery life.
- SD slot.
- FM radio.
- Voice recorder.
- Video.
- Photo.
- Podcasts.
- Bookmarks.
- Syncs with Outlook.
- The navigation buttons are okay, but a click wheel would be better.
- The firmware is a bit buggy. Creative probably rushed the Zen to market for Christmas.
- Days after I made my purchase, Creative reduced prices and released a 32GB model. Figures.
- It doesn't worked with iTunes.
I then tried Windows Media Player 11. It's a good jukebox, and it syncs with the Zen, but it really hates Apple and started moving music out of my iTunes directory and into My Music. Hey Bill, hands off my data!
I repaired my music library and tried Winamp 5.5. After the install, all my desktop icons had been shoved into columns at the left of my screen. Argh! Winamp works well, but when displaying content on the Zen, it only displays the music library, playlists, and video. It doesn't display the photo, voice recordings, and other folders. I'm not using them right now, but when I do, I'd like to be able to manage them all with the same software.
The Creative Media Explorer software that came with the player is very 1997. It puts a startup page in Windows Explorer with options like Browse Media, Manage Playlists, etc. It manages media by file and folder, exactly the same way Windows Explorer works. It's very cumbersome for managing a media library. It doesn't have a "smart" playlist function.
So, I'm up and running. I like the player. But the word's still out on media management. For now, I'll use Winamp. I've got my icons back in place and Winamp has behaved itself otherwise.
Posted by
Mike M.
at
7:49 PM
0
comments
Labels: Guilty Pleasures, Hobbies
Sunday, November 4, 2007
Ikea Product Names I'd Like To See
Whenever I go to Ikea, I always wish I had some product cards that I could put on the displays. The trouble is, I always think of it when I'm there, never before I go.
FLIMSY
WOBBLY
RICKETY
SKEWED
FRUMPY
BOXY
FLOPPSY
WIDGET
DORK
SPUD
DOOFUS
LOCO
Posted by
Mike M.
at
10:09 AM
0
comments
Labels: Fun
Friday, October 26, 2007
Randy and Burton and Candy and Liz
Slowly over the last decade, Randy Bachman and Burton Cummings evolved into the Sweeney Sisters.
It was like one of those 3-D illusion pictures where you look at it, look at it, look at it ... then Bang! It's the frickin Sweeney sisters!
The first time Bachman and Cummings did something together after years of estrangement, it was unexpected and great. We just couldn't believe they were performing together again.
Then they started doing the occasional special event as The Guess Who. We couldn't get enough of them.
Then they started telling stories about the old days and how songs came to be. We loved it.
Several years in, I got off the bandwagon and starting asking, Why do people still get excited that these guys continue to play together?
Then it happened. They became Bachman & Cummings. They released a CD. They did a concert for TV. Burton's youthful black hair was a stark contrast to his geriatric skin. Their stories about the good old days became lounge-act banter.
Then they showed up live in the studio at WNED, the Buffalo, N.Y. PBS station. They talked to the host and played live during fund raising intermissions of their TV special. They nattered about how much they enjoy PBS television while the camera panned between them and the volunteers taking pledges on phones.
I have nothing against PBS or fund raising. I like The Guess Who, BTO, and some of Cummings' solo material. It's just that their transition to elder entertainers has been more caricature than graceful.
Posted by
Mike M.
at
10:02 PM
0
comments
Labels: Observations
Thursday, October 25, 2007
Guitar Theory
One of the early guitar-like instrument makers or players really blew it. Why do we learn to play using our dominant hand to pick and strum? Fretwork requires much more dexterity and precision. Wouldn't we be better musicians if we learned to play other-handed?
I doubt we could relearn to play other-handed to any measure of success. Too much brain training would have to be undone. But, learning from scratch....
I can't think of any instrument, that doesn't have strings and a neck, where the dominant hand doesn't take the dominant role.
Posted by
Mike M.
at
11:16 AM
2
comments
Labels: Observations
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
Brutal Structure, Delicious Action
I hadn't played poker in months, so I went to Fallsview last Friday. I love Friday nights at Fallsview. Gamblers come out to play and vacationers arrive for a weekend of fun.
I played in the 1/2 no-limit Texas Hold 'em game from 14:30-01:30. The buy-in for the game is $40 min. to $100 max. That's pretty small, 50 big blinds for a max. buy-in. The opening raise was usually to 10 or 12 with reraises going to 35, so a $100 stack isn't really enough to play a raised pot. The house takes a session fee in this game of $5 per half hour instead of raking the pot. At the ten player table, each player paying $10 per hour to play, a buy-in is taken off the table by the house every hour. That is hugely expensive! But the game has so many loose, bad players, that it's still profitable. And because players are there on vacation or just there to gamble, they usually don't mind losing and it ends up being fun to play.
I was card dead until about 21:00. I kept topping up to 100 so I could get a nice return if I got involved in a hand. A new guy who had been at the table for about ten hands made it 12 under the gun. A loose, but fairly solid player with a big stack called. A player to my left held his cards in a way that I knew meant he was going to play the hand, so I got great odds and called with QcJc. The flop came QQT giving me trip queens. It was checked to me. Now in this game, if you make three of a kind on the flop, it's pretty much written in stone that you check to hide the strength of your hand. Which is exactly why I bet 10. Poker is all about counter strategy. My opponents would reason that if I bet, I must be representing a queen and don't actually have one. And only betting 10 into a $51 pot, well that shows incredible weakness. The guy to my left folded. The original raiser called. The other guy folded. The turn made the board QQTK. My opponent bet out 35!
Okay. So the guy raised preflop UTG which meant that if he was a half decent player, he had a quality starting hand. Because of the way I played my hand and the level of thinking that was going on in this game, he probably thought I had a T. This meant he thought he could either beat a pair of tens or could make me fold a pair of tens. Therefore his likely starting hands were AA, KK, JJ, TT, AK, or AQ. I didn't think he had TT because if he did, he would have checked to me to let me bet again. He probably didn't have AQ because people hadn't been playing that hand aggressively in this game. If he had KK, I expect he would have made a probe bet on the flop instead of check/calling. I could beat the rest of his likely hands. My estimate was that I was about 70/30 or better to have the best hand. There was $106 in the pot. I had about $80 in front of me. I clearly had a +EV situation. I raised all-in. He confidently called and turned over AA. I turned over my QJ and he sighed. He didn't hit his two outer and I finally had some chips to play with.
Bluffing wasn't really an option at that table because it was difficult to get players to fold. I continued to wait for +EV situations, maximized my return when I had a winning hand, and kept the pot small when I wasn't sure. I continued to be card dead.
My best starting hand was AsKs. My best pocket pair was JJ. A solid player with $30 in front of him raised to 15. It was folded around to me in late position so I raised to put him all-in. He turned over QQ to beat my JJ. Oh, well. I managed to bob and weave and stay ahead of the session fees and go home +$58, plus a day out, plus a whole lot of fun, plus a lot of energy drink abuse. Oh, yeah, and I also got to use my murse. It worked great!
Glossary
+EV: Positive expected value.
A: Ace
K: King
Q: Queen
J: Jack
T: Ten
Trip, Trips: Three of a kind.
UTG: Under the gun. The player who is first to act.
Also see Wikipedia for their Poker Glossary and more about Texas Hold 'em.
Posted by
Mike M.
at
10:00 PM
1 comments
Labels: Poker
Tuesday, October 9, 2007
I've Got Stuff to Carry
I've gone and bought a murse. No, not a male nurse. A man purse.
Sometimes I just need to carry more stuff than will fit in my pockets. Not often. Just those times when I'm out on an urban day trip or out for a day at the poker room. Then I need to carry my meds, Altoids, glasses, sunglasses, pen, notebook, maybe a book if I have time to kill, maybe a bottle of water, maybe a snack. (I have blood sugar issues.)
I got it at Eddie Bauer. It's about 9x6x4 inches. It's close in size and design to the canvas kit bag my dad was issued in WWII. I wish he still had it. It would be so cool to use it.
I looked online to see what was out there and this one from Eddie Bauer fit the bill. I went to the store to check it out and while I was looking in the compartments and convincing myself it was a very manly bag a nice older woman came over to help me. I told her I wanted something to carry stuff that wouldn't fit in my pockets like a paperback and my glasses.
She said, "You need a murse."
Well, that comment told me that the bag I was holding was definitely not a murse and was therefore very manly indeed.
I said, "I'll take this one."
The tag calls it a Small Guide Bag. That sounds about right. The Web site calls it the Expedition Small Bag. Yep, you bet. I will make an expedition to the Fallsview poker room on Friday to try it out.
Posted by
Mike M.
at
9:27 PM
0
comments
Labels: Hobbies, Observations, Travel
Friday, September 28, 2007
Things That Sound Dirty But Aren’t
Back in this post, I mentioned my friend Teeb who collects words and phrases that sound dirty but aren't. The list has been kept in our heads for decades and our failing mental capacities have jeopardized the completeness and integrity of the data. In order to record the list and protect it from further deterioration, I'm going to keep it here and add to it as needed.
- Bonafide
- Back end processes
- Insertion order
- June Cleaver: "Ward, weren't you a little hard on the Beaver?"
- Stimulus Package (Courtesy of George W. Bush, 2008)
- Hard six (A type of bet in craps.)
- Entry-level position
- Philatelist
- Executrix
- Polishing my Oscar
- Pictorial
- Live Circus Acts
- Full frontal
- Big pink eyesore
- Flopping the nuts (Poker jargon from Teeb.)
- Live straddle (Poker jargon from Teeb.)
- Munchkin (Thanks Sass!)
- Balzac
- Goblin
Posted by
Mike M.
at
8:21 PM
1 comments
Labels: Guilty Pleasures, Observations
Monday, September 24, 2007
Pariah Dogs and Wandering Madmen
I saw Rush at the ACC on September 19th and 22nd. I went with S, another man's wife. It's okay. He knows. Neither of our spouses are Rush fans, so we have a standing date for dinner and a show every time the tour comes to Toronto.
My wife, V, is obsessive about accumulating Jack points. It paid off. The morning of the Wednesday show, I learned that she won tickets to the Saturday show. She was very happy for me and very proud of her radio contest prowess and that her obsessive compulsiveness had a positive outcome. The seats were in section 108, about centre ice and fifteen rows up. My seats on Wednesday were in section 101 at the back of the arena, nine rows up with a direct stage view. On Wednesday I watched the video screens a lot. On Saturday I was close enough to watch the band. S joined me for the second show. She wore her Presto tour shirt. My Farewell To Kings shirt hasn't fit since the Presto tour, so I was out of luck, vintage-shirt-wise. We had a blast.
On stage behind Geddy Lee were three ovens the size of large vending machines. They had glass paneled fronts and were filled with rotisserie chickens. I love their humour and inner-weirdness. They are three guys who would surely be misfits in any other situation.
Sometime in the '90s I stopped paying attention to lyrics. If a song had tragic or idiotic lyrics and a beat, I would bop to it. I just got tired of bothering with lyrics because most of them were fluff. In the last year I started paying attention again, at least enough to notice which were worth it. I think Alanis making fun of Fergie might have been the trigger.
I looked through Rush lyrics to find a title for this post. My god, most of them are depressing. They're very well crafted, but most deal with struggle, conflict, and oppression. Neil has issues. I don't remember that from when I was an obsessive fan in the '70's and '80's. I remember finding the lyrics intelligent and insightful. But I was at an age then when struggling, conflict, and being oppressed were standard issue and were badges of honour. Even a song like The Spirit of Radio that is upbeat and energetic, lyrics included for the most part, concludes with:
One likes to believe in the freedom of music
But glittering prizes and endless compromises
Shatter the illusion of integrity
And yet I still feel good, get a rush (sorry) and bop to it whenever I hear it. How do they do that?
I noticed an interesting thing while reading dozens of Rush lyrics: the music of their songs gets much of its complexity from the way the lyrics are written. The rhyme, the meter, the length of lines and stanzas. The music has to be written to accommodate all that.
The show was three hours long with a twenty minute break. Not bad for a bunch of old guys, much of the audience included. They had plenty of lights, lasers, pyrotechnics, and videos. It was a great show. They kind of have to have all of that going on because the three of them are so busy creating all that sound with their hands and feet that sometimes they don't have the freedom to be animated on stage.
A Bob & Doug McKenzie video introduced The Larger Bowl. A South Park video introduced Tom Sawyer. Other videos featuring band members were shown to open the concert, return from the intermission, and close the show after the encore.
The people with floor seats stood for the whole show. The people in the stands stood for the first three songs, for favourite songs, and for the three-song encore.
Once during each set, a crew member came on stage in a chef's hat and apron to baste the chickens. When this happened at the show on Saturday, eight guys in row 1, centre floor, put on chef's hats. It cracked Alex and Geddy up!
Big Al's Babes are a bunch of Barbie doll groupies around the gear at the base of Alex's mic stand. A search landed me at 2112.net which explained that roadies set up the babes so they hold Post-It signs that say things like: My Mom Thinks Your Hot!, I'm Only Doing This To Pay For College, Freebird!, and I Thought ZZ Top Had Beards.
Rush has always attracted fans who are musicians. Their music is usually complex, requiring precision and technique. They also attract individualists and independent thinkers. Their lyrics are smart and thought provoking and generally deal with protagonists who go against the grain. They have occasionally had songs make the charts, but they have never set out to write commercial songs. A lot of their appeal comes from the fact that they have completely disregarded music industry axioms. The rebellion and nonconformity are part of the attraction for their huge core following.
The excitement of the shows re-sparked my enthusiasm, so I started poking around the Internet to see what was out there about the band. There are a lot of fan sites and picture galleries. Wikipedia has a lot of information and it was there that I found a link to Durrell Scott Bowman's PhD. dissertation Permanent Change: Rush, Musicians’ Rock, and the Progressive Post-Counterculture. How cool is that? I'm only 25 pages into the 331 page document, but so far, it's a great read. Thanks Durrell!
Posted by
Mike M.
at
10:45 AM
0
comments
Labels: Guilty Pleasures, Observations
Sunday, September 9, 2007
An Open Letter to Jerry Bruckheimer
Dear Mr. Bruckheimer,
Your movies and television shows have entertained me for decades.
I share your disappointment over the cancellation of Justice. I hope it can be resurrected. Victor Garber was excellent as a psychopathic lawyer. I enjoyed the show very much.
I continue to be a loyal viewer of Without a Trace and the CSI franchises.
Last season I was disheartened to see that Detective Calleigh Duquesne, played by Emily Procter on CSI: Miami, began dressing appropriately to perform ballistics tests. Although Ms. Proctor is delicious in a lab coat, and the lab coat adds credibility to the show, I think we can agree that credibility is not a standard to which CSI: Miami aspires. Surely you do not intend for Lieutenant Horatio Caine, played by David Caruso, to start being credible with respect to his dialog, inter-personal relationships, body language, or affectations with his sun glasses. Similarly, Detective Duquesne should return to performing ballistics tests in a tank top.
Picture the following scene performed by Ms. Proctor in a tank top versus a lab coat:
Detective Duquesne assumes the Weaver stance. With the camera at pistol height, we see her from the front and slightly to the right. She aims. She fires. Her head remains stationary; her eyes open. Her pectoral muscles flex to brace against the recoil, resulting in movement about the chest and shoulders.
Clearly, credibility in this case is at the expense of the premise of the show and quite possibly at the expense of Ms. Proctor's celebrity. As a fan of both you and Ms. Proctor, and on behalf of the viewing public, I ask that you consider returning to your original choice of attire for Detective Duquesne performing ballistics tests.
Your loyal fan,
Rex
Posted by
Mike M.
at
10:30 PM
1 comments
Labels: Guilty Pleasures
Thursday, September 6, 2007
Smoking Is Cool
I don't smoke. I've heard it's bad for me. But there's something about smoking I find appealing. Not the smoking that happens in shirt sleeves in the winter outside office buildings. That's just depraved. The kind that happens in movies. The kind that used to happen in bars and cafes—except when smoke drifts into the smoker's eyes and he squints because it hurts and he has to move his head out of the cloud. That's not cool. That's just an ugly addiction. But, but, if the smoke didn't drift into his eyes, if it wafted upward and a little to the side in a languorous blue ribbon, then, then you'd have cool. See how that's cool? And suppose he had a glass of scotch. In a thick lowball glass with a heavy base. On the rocks. But just three rocks. Rocks that are transparent and solid, their surfaces washed smooth and clear with just enough dents and curves to give them character. And he's casually leaning back, arm cocked at the elbow, the cigarette looking like it's part of his hand. And his face is relaxed, mouth hinting at a smile. He's about to say something important. Maybe he's listening intently to a friend. Or maybe he's alone and just enjoying the moment. Turning the glass slowly to look at the reflections and refractions. Or gazing at the small fire he controls at his fingertips. See how that's cool? Sometimes I wish I smoked.
Posted by
Mike M.
at
9:22 PM
0
comments
Labels: Observations
Wednesday, September 5, 2007
The Enchanted Beach Which Can Be Used As a Table
Posted by
Mike M.
at
11:48 PM
0
comments
Labels: Autobiography, Hobbies, Travel
Friday, August 24, 2007
Americans at Loblaws
So I’m in the packaged meat section shopping for bacon. I push my cart off to the side and step closer to scan the selections. Bacon’s bacon as far as I’m concerned. Some has less salt, some is just non-accessorized bacon. So it really just comes down to price point for me. A good lean cut at a good price.
Trixie draws a bead on the bacon and barges in front of me. “’Scuse me, hon.,” she says as she bends in and starts rifling through the packages.
“No problem,” I say as she gives me a view of what I’m sure she thinks is her best side. I’m not up on the barging etiquette of suburban
Trixie says to the bacon, “I like the one with less salt,” as she pokes through the reduced salt packages.
James says, “Maybe the Canadians don’t measure that.”
I wait it out.
He speaks up and says, “I guess the Canadians don’t measure that.”
I’m not sure if that’s aimed at me or Trixie, but Trixie is distracted enough to look up at him and move out of the way. She’s dislodged a good looking package from the pile and I grab it while I have the opportunity and make a hasty retreat.
There’s a cart jam in isle 6. A guy is overwhelmed by the selection of salsa while a woman is waiting to get some and everyone else is reduced to one lane to squeeze by.
As I approach, the guy says, “I moved to
The waiting woman starts to respond but the guy speaks up to talk over her, “The Mexicans make it in
I take my turn to squeeze by and see that he’s choosing between Old El Paso and the store brand. The woman realizes it’s not a two way conversation, so she stops trying and leans on her cart until she can get to the shelf. The guy’s face turns sour and he says, “Guess they don’t have the hot,” while he continues to ponder his options.
What’s the deal with American visitors? I was on vacation in
Posted by
Mike M.
at
11:49 AM
0
comments
Labels: Observations
Wednesday, August 1, 2007
A Stroll Through Oak Park, Illinois
Posted by
Mike M.
at
11:04 AM
0
comments
Labels: Guilty Pleasures, Travel
Tuesday, July 31, 2007
My Albatross (Part 1)
I have social anxiety disorder. It’s not who I am or what I think, but it drastically limits how I’m able to function with people. It’s sometimes called social phobia. Like all phobias, it’s an irrational fear of something harmless.
Do you know anyone who has extreme anxiety or panic attacks over things like heights, flying, spiders, snakes, enclosed spaces? It happens to me in crowded places, when strangers approach, dealing with authority figures, job interviews, or having to speak at a function or meeting. The thought of going to a party sends my anxiety soaring.
When I tell people about this, they usually respond, “What? You? No way!” I've gotten pretty good at hiding it most of the time. Outside, I’m calm and have a quiet, strong demeanor. Inside, I’m wound tight and am consciously controlling my breathing and relaxing my muscles. It’s incredibly distracting. It makes it hard to concentrate on what’s going on around me and what people are saying. And if I miss what’s going on, I can’t participate effectively, then my anxiety rises and I have to consciously control … you get the picture.
What’s the long term solution? Well, my fight-or-flight response somehow became associated with harmless social interactions. It doesn't matter how at this point, though it’s probably largely hereditary. The solution is to change the association. I have to learn to associate social activity with pleasure instead of fear. I want to enjoy being social.
The short term solution is medication. I take Paxil and lorazepam every day. I take additional lorazepam if I know I’m going to need help dealing with a situation. They have helped, but not without cost. They have raised the bar so that I’m reasonably functional in public. But lorazepam is a tranquilizer. And though it’s a godsend to have some relief from anxiety and to ward off a flat out panic attack, being tranquil takes the edge off things like ambition, motivation, mental acuity, and joy. For the most part it’s a good trade off. The trouble is, the short term has lasted ten years so far. It turns out that changing psychological associations is extremely difficult.
Posted by
Mike M.
at
4:30 PM
0
comments
Labels: Autobiography, Demons
Monday, July 30, 2007
Best Fishes
A high school classmate contacted me on Facebook this week and asked, "Remember me?" She's married, so she gave me her maiden name which sounded familiar, but I wasn't sure.
I found my memorabilia box with yearbooks in it and flipped open 1979. A large photo dropped from inside the front cover. I picked it up and Steve Martin smiled in a white suit with a fish sticking out of his jacket just above the top button. The autograph reads, "Best Fishes, Steve Martin." It was an insert from one of his albums. Remember that? That was awesome!
I saw Steve Martin once playing poker in the Mirage poker room in Las Vegas. He was on a break during the filming of Sgt. Bilko. He was in a seven card stud game. There was a list a mile long to join Steve's game. He wore a red baseball cap with his head tilted forward so the brim gave him privacy. No one was bothering him.
When I finished playing, I racked my chips and headed to the poker room cashier. As I walked by his table, his head tilted and the brim of his cap rose to reveal his face. He looked straight at my eyes. His face was deadpan. He showed no emotion. Maybe it was his poker face. I knew of him as a comedian, so his blank faced stare was extra creepy. I felt like he was daring me to annoy him. I left him alone and continued on to the cashier.
In one of those wish-I'd-thought-of-it-at-the-time moments, I wish I'd smiled and said, "Cheer up. It's a game!" and continued walking without intruding.
Best Fishes Steve.
I found my classmate's picture. I remember her being in some of my classes, but we weren't in the same social groups. It makes me wonder what I did to be memorable to her.
Posted by
Mike M.
at
11:42 AM
3
comments
Labels: Autobiography, Poker